Would Trump Be Quiet if Hillary Clinton Became President?

The speculation about how the political landscape would shift if Hillary Clinton had become the President in 2016 remains a fascinating topic of discussion. Many argue that, without the interference from Russia and Clinton's strategic choices, Clinton might have won the presidency, and we would now be living in a different era free from the chaos, division, and violence that have marked the past years.

What Alternate Scenarios Would Be Like

Imagine a scenario where Trump, instead of continuing his public displays of dissent and accusations, found himself in a different political arena. If we were to consider what he would do if he had 'super powers,' it might have been a more entertaining but ultimately non-functional assumption. However, let's explore what might have transpired if Clinton had taken office.

Continuation of Strategies and Influence

Assuming Hillary Clinton won the presidency, it’s quite probable that Trump would have continued his aggressive tactics of denying the election results. Similar to the current situation, Trump could be expected to continue proclaiming that the election was stolen and to make public statements about fraud, which would likely draw significant media attention and political backlash. This would have likely involved persistent calls to Putin for help in his cause, as well as seeking legal and political means to overturn the results, even if these efforts were ultimately unsuccessful. Given this, Trump might have escalated his rhetoric to include calls for a second insurrection, similar to what he is currently doing with the January 6th insurrection.

Differences in Character and Approach

While Clinton's presidency might have brought some level of stability and continuity in policy, there are stark contrasts in their leadership styles. According to reports, Clinton has been described as more inclined to exert a bullying presence and to be harsh in her treatment of those who work for her. This would likely result in a more authoritarian and unpredictable political environment.

In comparison, Trump's approach, which has been characterized as more mercenary and self-serving, might have influenced his behavior if he had super powers. However, Clinton's victory might have seen a return to more traditional political power dynamics, where she would have continued to act in her self-interest, but with a more subtle and calculated approach to public relations and personal branding.

Public and Private Behaviors

It is often said that people's true character is shown in private, and this is especially true for public figures like Clinton and Trump. According to numerous reports, Trump is known to be more kind and generous in private, which sheds light on his behavior in public. In contrast, Clinton has been accused of being more abusive and harsh to those around her, particularly in her role as First Lady.

The Impact of Such a Presidency

Reflecting on the current climate, it is easy to see how a Clinton presidency might not have altered the trajectory of American politics in any significant way. Instead, it may have led to a continuation of issues such as election interference and partisan divisions. There would likely have been more legal battles and schisms within the Republican and Democratic parties.

The accusation that Trump would continue to lie about the election and create division and chaos even if denied power suggests a deep-seated distrust in the democratic process. This trust issue, along with the potential rise of conspiracy theories and further polarization, would have likely persisted regardless of who assumed the presidency in 2016.

Conclusion

In conclusion, if Hillary Clinton had become President in 2016, the political landscape might have appeared more stable on the surface, but ultimately, the political divisions, distrust, and chaos would have continued in different forms. The truth is that the fundamental issues driving these conflicts are rooted deeper than the personalities of the individuals in the White House. It takes more than changing administrations to address the underlying causes of such division and conflict.