In a world where the need for basic necessities like shelter and food is universal, the question arises, why aren't these fundamental rights provided without cost? This article delves into the complexities of this issue within a capitalist framework and explores alternative models that could potentially address these challenges.

Questioning the Cost of Essentials

The primary challenge in providing free housing and food lies in the question of who will bear the cost. As we consider that these basic resources should be available to everyone, the initial response might be to place this burden on the government. However, if the government is required to fund such initiatives, it raises the question: where will the money come from? The most logical answer points to taxes, which ultimately means taxpayers would have to fund these services, despite being unwilling to provide them for free.

Capitalism and Resource Allocation

The capitalist system thrives on demand and supply dynamics. It relies on the existence of markets where goods and services are traded for profit. If everyone had their basic needs met for free, the market for these goods would essentially collapse. For instance, without the need for housing, there would be no housing market, and the economy would suffer. Therefore, the concept of "free" on a societal level becomes more complicated and multifaceted.

One might argue that we do have a surplus of food and housing; the issue lies in distribution rather than production. However, the capitalist system can only function in a way that perpetuates inequality, with some experiencing poverty while others accumulate wealth. This arrangement ensures that the market remains vibrant and continues to generate profit.

Alternative Models and Their Viability

Some have forward-thinking ideas about providing free housing and food through alternative models. For example, security-based production without the capitalist mode of production could make these essentials accessible to everyone. However, such models face significant barriers, especially in countries like the United States, which is dominated by greedy and largely uncompassionate political leaders. These leaders are more concerned with personal wealth and power than the well-being of their citizens.

The Current Reality

Currently, we have social programs like food stamps, which provide crucial support to those in need. However, these programs are under threat from the policies of the current administration. The president's actions to dismantle social safety nets, such as Medicare and Social Security, have sparked outrage among millions of Americans. Many regular citizens hope for a change in leadership that could bring about more equitable policies.

Future Prospects and Social Movements

The dream of affordable housing, food, medicines, and medical care for all is not impossible. It will take time and significant changes in the social and political landscape, but it is a vision worth striving for. The path to this future may involve the death of a generation of greedy individuals who have amassed vast fortunes, as they have contributed to the current state of affairs. This change could also inspire social movements that demand more equitable distribution of resources.

However, it is ultimately up to the American people to rise up and demand change. The future of the nation depends on the actions of its citizens in the face of systemic inequality. Only through widespread solidarity and proactive policies can we move towards a society where basic needs are met without cost.