Why Bus Drivers Allow Crowded Aisles: A Case Study from Pittsburgh in the 1980s and Early 1990s
As much as it might be frustrating to see so many people standing in the bus aisle, it is often the case that the local bus driver simply cannot control overcrowding on the bus. Let's dive into a detailed analysis of the bus system in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from the 1980s to the early 1990s, focusing on the reasons why bus drivers allow so many people to stand on the bus aisle.
Why You Might Not Want More People on the Bus
Many individuals would prefer it if bus drivers refused to allow more passengers on when the bus is already overcrowded. However, it is important to understand that the decision to limit boarding is ultimately up to the local transit authority and enforced by transportation regulations, not the driver. This means that even if drivers would be idealistic about safeguarding standing room only, they are constrained by practical considerations and policies.
Preventing Standing Passengers
One potential approach to reducing the number of people standing on the bus is to limit boarding when the driver stops at a bus stop, but this would only further congest the bus and delay the service for everyone. Additionally, such an approach would be administratively challenging to implement effectively, and it might lead to inefficiencies in the transportation network.
Understanding the Bus System in Pittsburgh, PA
In the 1980s and early 1990s, the bus system in Pittsburgh, particularly in the East Busway (EBA), was a well-known example of overcrowded conditions during peak hours. The EBA was a dedicated line that ran along the East Busway, which only allowed public buses and emergency vehicles. The bus route extended from the downtown area to Wilkinsburg and followed surface streets, with some portions employing dedicated lanes for buses and emergency vehicles.
Bus Overcrowding During Rush Hour
During peak hours, especially rush hours, the EBA route experienced severe overcrowding. This cramming of passengers often left no room for seating, leading to standing passengers occupying the aisle and extending into aisles on neighboring buses.
Passenger Behavior and Transit Policies
Passengers realized that if the bus is too crowded, they can simply wait for the next one, which often provides more room. For instance, during the inbound and outbound morning and afternoon rush hours, passengers often opted to wait a few minutes for a less overcrowded bus, knowing that one would soon arrive. This behavior significantly eased the congestion on the overcrowded buses.
Impact of Traffic Signals on Bus Congestion
The EBA route also had multiple traffic signals, which affected the bus's speed and efficiency. Bus drivers found that by skipping one or two overly crowded buses, they could often catch a bus with more space if they were patient. The randomness of traffic lights made this strategy effective and predictable enough to be widely adopted by passengers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, bus drivers are often unable to control the overcrowding of buses, especially during peak hours. Passengers have a significant role to play in these situations, and strategies like waiting for a less crowded bus or the chaotic nature of downtown traffic signals can sometimes ease the congestion.
If you're interested in learning more about bus systems, transit policies, and strategies to mitigate overcrowding, feel free to explore the vast resources available online. The understanding of these systems is crucial for the efficient operation of urban public transportation.