Why American Math Teachers Don’t Teach Techniques Like Scott Flansburg’s
There is a persistent debate in educational circles regarding the methods used in American math education. One of the recurring questions is why American math teachers are not embracing the innovative techniques pioneered by renowned 'human calculator,' Scott Flansburg. The focus of math education should not solely be on memorizing procedures but on fostering a deeper understanding of number properties and operations. This article explores the reasons behind the current teaching methods and why incorporating techniques like those used by Scott Flansburg could be beneficial.
The Purpose of Math Education
The core aim of teaching mathematics is to equip students with the ability to think critically, solve problems, and understand the intrinsic patterns and properties of numbers. Traditional methods, often centered around rote memorization and procedural algorithms, fail to achieve this. Instead, they often produce students who can perform calculations accurately but lack a deep conceptual understanding of the underlying principles.
Scott Flansburg's Innovative Techniques
Scott Flansburg, known as the 'Human Calculator,' has made a name for himself by demonstrating fantastic speed and accuracy in performing complex calculations. His methods are not only efficient but also deeply rooted in simple number properties and patterns. For instance, Flansburg’s method of multiplying by 10, 100, and 1,000 involves merely adding zeros, which is a concept easily grasped by children. His style of teaching emphasizes making math fun and accessible, which can significantly improve student engagement and interest.
Current Teaching Methods in American Schools
Procedural algorithms are common in American math classrooms. For example, long division and long multiplication are frequently taught. While these methods are effective in achieving correct results, they often fail to provide students with a deep understanding of the underlying mathematical properties and logic. This difference in approach can be attributed to several factors:
1. Standardized Testing
The emphasis on standardized testing in American schools often leads to a focus on procedural success over conceptual understanding. Teachers feel the pressure to ensure their students can perform well on these tests, which are primarily designed to assess the ability to apply standard algorithms rather than to foster critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
2. Curriculum Standards
Many American schools adhere to specific curriculum standards, such as Common Core, which provide detailed guidelines on the methods to be taught. While these standards aim to cover a broad range of skills, they may not always encourage flexibility in teaching methods. Teachers are required to follow these guidelines, which can sometimes limit their ability to experiment with alternative techniques.
3. Teacher Training and Resources
There is a lack of teacher training that emphasizes the importance of fostering conceptual understanding over procedural fluency. Furthermore, teachers often lack access to the necessary resources, such as specialized materials and support, to effectively implement innovative teaching methods.
Benefits of Incorporating Flansburg’s Techniques
Incorporating techniques similar to those used by Scott Flansburg could significantly enhance math education in American schools. Here are a few potential benefits:
1. Increased Engagement
Flansburg’s methods are often more engaging and fun, which can lead to increased student interest in math. Engaging students from a young age can help them develop a positive mindset toward the subject and increase their likelihood of pursuing further studies in mathematics.
2. Deeper Conceptual Understanding
Focusing on number properties and simple patterns can help students develop a deeper understanding of the underlying principles. This approach can lead to better problem-solving skills and a more robust foundation in math, which is crucial for advanced studies.
3. Development of Critical Thinking Skills
By teaching alternative methods, students are encouraged to think critically and creatively. This can improve their ability to solve complex problems and think outside the box, which are essential skills in today’s rapidly changing world.
Call for Change
The educational system in America is at a crossroads. It is time for educators and policymakers to reconsider the traditional approach to teaching math and embrace innovative methods. Incorporating techniques like those used by Scott Flansburg can help create a more comprehensive and enjoyable learning experience for students, ultimately leading to a better-prepared and more engaged future generation.
Conclusion
The methods used in American math education have evolved over time, but there is still room for improvement. By adopting techniques inspired by Scott Flansburg, American math teachers can foster a deeper understanding of number properties, increase student engagement, and develop critical thinking skills. It is time to rethink the traditional approach and embrace an education that truly prepares students for the challenges of the 21st century.