Which Slot of CAT 2017 Was Easier: Slot 1 or Slot 2?

Each year, the Common Admission Test (CAT) for MBA aspirants presents two slots, and the perception of which is easier can vary widely based on individual performance and preparation. In the context of the CAT 2017, notable differences were observed in the difficulty levels of the two slots. In this article, we explore the experiences and perceptions of students who took the test in either slot 1 or 2 during this particular year.

Overview of CAT 2017 Slots

The CAT 2017 exam provided two slots, each containing multiple sections: Quantitative Ability (QA), Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation (LRDI), and Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC).

Comparing Slot 1 and Slot 2

Generally, slot 1 was considered to be easier than slot 2, based on the feedback from students and educators. Here’s a detailed comparison between the two slots:

Slot 1

Overall Difficulty Level: Moderate.
Quantitative Ability (QA) Section: A good mix of easier and moderately difficult questions.
Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation (LRDI) Section: Manageable for most students.

Slot 2

Overall Difficulty Level: Perceived as more challenging.
Quantitative Ability (QA) Section: More difficult questions that required deeper analytical skills.
Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation (LRDI) Section: Contained complex sets that required more time and analytical skills.

Student and Teacher Perceptions

Despite these generalizations, the perception of difficulty can vary among students based on their strengths and preparation. Some students reported that they faced particular challenges in specific sections of slot 2, particularly the LRDI section. For instance, a student who took slot 2 mentioned:

The DI LR section was extremely difficult. I could only do 3 sets. I was nervous and confused, and not just me; people in my slot were struggling to even solve one set. These sets formed a major chunk of the paper, and they could definitely keep me out of danger.

It is important to note that no one took both slots on the same day, which makes a direct comparison challenging. Teachers and experts also mentioned that the difficulty setup is designed to be fair and balanced, with a few questions potentially varying in difficulty. Therefore, while some students found the second slot more challenging, others might have found the first slot more difficult based on their individual strengths and preparation.

Feedback Gaps

While various student feedback and teacher opinions are available, it is crucial to recognize that 98% of students do not offer feedback on their experience. This gap in feedback can make it difficult to accurately assess the overall difficulty level. Additionally, comparisons to other exams or previous years can add to the subjectivity and can vary greatly.

For instance:

The paper was difficult but easier compared to XYZ. Easier compared to XYZ but difficult compared to last year. Slightly difficult. Moderately difficult. Extremely difficult. Very easy. Easy but difficult.

These varied opinions highlight the subjectivity involved in evaluating the difficulty of the CAT exam.

Conclusion

Based on the feedback and personal experiences of students and teachers, it is generally agreed that Slot 1 of the CAT 2017 was easier than Slot 2. However, individual performance can vary significantly, making it essential to prepare thoroughly for both sections to ensure the best possible outcome.