Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated: Which Group Has More COVID Cases?
The ongoing debate surrounding vaccine effectiveness has raised many questions, particularly regarding infection rates within vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. While it is often claimed that one group has more cases than the other, a closer look reveals that the situation is more nuanced. This article aims to clarify these misconceptions and provide a clearer understanding of the relationship between vaccination and infection rates.
Understanding the Equivalence of Infection Rates
Contrary to popular belief, the infection rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are nearly equivalent. This equivalence suggests that the current infection patterns are not due to the effectiveness of the vaccines. Instead, the continued presence of measures intended to exacerbate the spread and severity of the disease, such as lack of early treatment, should be examined.
The Importance of Early Treatment
Early and appropriate medical intervention is vital for the recovery of patients. Unfortunately, this crucial aspect has been systematically ignored by WHO government officials and the media. Recommendations for self-isolation or quarantine remove any chance of early treatment, which can significantly impact the recovery process.
Attacks on Alternate Treatments
There has also been a concerted effort to discredit and ban alternative treatments, which could potentially offer promising outcomes. Dr. Shankara Chetty, for example, has treated over 7,000 COVID patients with 100% recovery rates without any adverse outcomes. This success underscores the importance of considering a variety of treatment options, rather than relying solely on experimental medications with minimal responsibility from manufacturers.
Quantifying the Impact of Vaccination
Given the nearly identical infection rates, it is crucial to understand how vaccination affects the spread of the disease. In the United Kingdom, approximately 90% of the over-12 population has at least partial vaccination. This large vaccinated population can help illustrate the true effectiveness of vaccines. Let's consider the numbers:
Risk Analysis: Vaccination Effectiveness
Suppose the vaccines were completely ineffective at preventing infection. In that case, the number of vaccinated individuals getting infected should be very high—more than nine times the number of unvaccinated individuals, as the vaccinated population is nine times larger.
However, if we observe that there are double the number of vaccinated people getting infected compared to unvaccinated individuals, it would suggest that the vaccines are around 80% effective. Here's the math to substantiate this:
If the number is double, it’s a 2:1 ratio.
If inoculation were completely ineffective, it would be a 9:1 ratio.
2/9 0.22 (or 22%) so only 22% of people would be getting infected.
100 - 22 78% so vaccines are 78% effective at preventing infection.
This analysis demonstrates how easily numbers can be misrepresented, leading to misunderstandings about the effectiveness of vaccines.
Effectiveness of Vaccination
It is important to note that vaccinated individuals still get infected, but the difference is in how quickly and effectively they fight off the infection. This is why the number of infections does not necessarily reflect the safety of either group. Vaccines do not impair immunity but help the body respond more robustly and rapidly to the virus.
In conclusion, the key to addressing the complex dynamics of infection rates lies in understanding the role of early intervention, the effectiveness of vaccines, and the necessity of considering all available treatment options. Misrepresenting data can lead to unnecessary fear and misdirected efforts. Accurate information and a holistic approach to public health are crucial in navigating the ongoing challenges posed by the pandemic.