Understanding Joe Biden’s Decision to Pardon His Son Hunter: A Critical Analysis
The recent decision by Joe Biden to pardon his convicted son, Hunter Biden, has sparked intense debate and criticism. Critics question whether this act reflects a bias in the Justice Department (DOJ), a claim that necessitates a deeper dive into the historical and contemporary context of the DOJ under different administrations.
The Myth of Joe Biden’s Independent DOJ
Some individuals, particularly those who support former President Donald Trump, argue that Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter indicates bias within the DOJ. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, it is important to understand that the DOJ is designed to be independent of the President and non-political in its operations. Under both Barack Obama and Joe Biden, this principle has been acknowledged and respected, albeit imperfectly under Trump's tenure. The idea that Biden’s DOJ is uniquely biased is a misconception.
Political Bias Under the Trump Administration
During the Trump administration, the DOJ significantly deviated from its ideal of independence. The elevation of MAGA (Make America Great Again) appointees to key positions within the DOJ created a legal environment that was not merely independent but heavily politicized. This political influence undermined the DOJ's ability to operate impartially, as evidenced by numerous controversies and cases where political considerations played a critical role.
Why MAGA Supporters Miss the Point
Many MAGA supporters mistakenly believe that the DOJ belongs to the President and can be used as a tool to attack perceived enemies. This view is emblematic of a broader political culture that conflates executive power with personal justice. However, the independence of the DOJ is a safeguard against such abuses. The fact that Hunter Biden was prosecuted for activities that others might not have faced demonstrates the politicized nature of the DOJ under Trump.
Biden’s Oversight and the Persistence of Infection
Biden has faced criticism for not fully addressing this politicization during his administration. He did not remove all MAGA appointees from the DOJ, leaving many from the previous administration in key roles. Additionally, he allowed Merrick Garland, who served as a federal judge under Trump, to remain as head of the DOJ. This decision suggests a misalignment between the administration’s rhetoric and its actions.
Biden’s complacency in allowing these conditions to persist highlights a significant failure in his governance. If he had taken decisive action to depoliticize the DOJ, many of the actions and policies that arose during the Trump administration might have been prevented. This failure has real-world consequences for American society and the impartiality of the legal system.
Implications for the Future
The Joe Biden administration's handling of the DOJ underscores the importance of institutional independence in the United States. The politicized nature of the DOJ under Trump represents a significant threat to the rule of law and democratic norms. By not addressing this issue decisively, Biden’s administration has set a concerning precedent.
It is a solemn reminder for citizens to remain vigilant in monitoring the actions of those in power. Future generations will judge the current administration based on how effectively these issues are addressed. Observing the outcomes of key appointments, especially in the DOJ, FBI, and DHS, is crucial for understanding the future trajectory of American governance.
The lesson to be learned is that unchecked political influence in critical institutions like the DOJ can have devastating repercussions. As American citizens, it is our responsibility to stay informed and engaged to ensure that these institutions remain robust and independent.