The Omission of Balanced Individualism and Collectivism in American Politics
Why is a healthy balance between individualism and collectivism rarely discussed in America? This topic often leads to a 'either-or' viewpoint, where one must choose one over the other. This article explores the principles behind these concepts, their impact on human nature and societal context, and the polarizing nature of current political discourse.
The Principles of Individualism and Collectivism
Principles should inform people's lives, but individualism and collectivism are often misunderstood or misapplied. Individualism imposes a standard on people, stating that it is their responsibility to decide what is in their best interest. In tough times, successful individuals are expected to help others, based on the assumption that they succeeded under fair standards. However, this is not always the case. In practice, we live in a system dominated by capitalists who are often under 'fascist lite' control, rather than a true individualist or capitalist system.
The Context of People's Lives
Helping people should not disregard their intrinsic human nature. Politicians often fail to respect the value of dollars earned by others, making them unsuitable to be custodians of that wealth. Instead, the best custodians are the individuals who earned it. Government policies, particularly those from labor/Leftist administrations, often bait the poor with false narratives of victimhood, leading to further divisions.
Understanding ‘This vs That’ Politics
The dichotomy between individualism and collectivism is not just binary; it often leads to highly polarized and confrontational discourse. There is a lack of reconciliation or good faith. Politicians often placate vested interests, creating "entrenched tribes" that engage in extortion rackets to buy votes. This reality undermines the legitimacy of both the Left and Right postures, with the Right often seen as more aspirational.
Effects of a Muted Anglo-Western Mindset
There is no balanced level of collectivism. Collectivism is damaging at best and entirely destructive at worst, unless it is inaccurately labeled. Emile Durkheim attributed the polarizing mentality to the First-Past-The-Post electoral system prevalent in the Anglosphere. Other regions like Western Europe use proportional representation (PR) systems, which drive more diverse and coalition-minded political landscapes.
Cultural and Philosophical Influences
Philosopher Hegel's 'dialectical' thinking further exacerbates this mentality, suggesting that thesis and antithesis cannot coexist peacefully and must reduce to one form. This extends to various dichotomies such as Christianity vs. Judaism, Protestantism vs. Catholicism, and democracy vs. authoritarianism. The same binary thinking applies to philosophical and religious debates.
Understanding and balancing individualism and collectivism in American politics is crucial for creating a more resilient and fair society. The current polarized discourse often misses key principles of human nature and societal context, leading to ineffective and often destructive policies.
Key Takeaways
Individualism and collectivism should not be seen as mutually exclusive. Preserve the intrinsic human nature when providing assistance. Polarizing politics often overlook principles, leading to ineffective policies. Consider alternative voting systems and philosophical approaches for balanced governance.Contact us for more information on how to navigate the complexities of American politics and promote balanced principles.