The Intersection of Applied Philosophy and Just War Doctrine: An Analysis of Modern Warfare and Ethical Dilemmas

Understanding Applied Philosophy

Applied philosophy is a field that focuses on the practical application of philosophical principles to real-world problems. Unlike theoretical philosophy, which seeks to understand the nature and relationships of fundamental concepts, applied philosophy aims to address specific issues and practical challenges. This article explores the role of applied philosophy in contemporary issues, with a particular focus on the Just War Doctrine as outlined by Clausewitz and its implications for modern warfare.

The Clausewitz Paradox: Philosophical Grounding for the Just War Doctrine

Carl von Clausewitz, a Prussian military strategist and theorist, introduced the concept of Clausewitz Paradox, which posits that war is the continuation of politics by other means. This paradox lays the groundwork for the Just War Doctrine, a set of principles that guide military actions and their moral justifications. The Just War Doctrine, particularly emphasized at institutions like the US Army War College, emphasizes the need for a balance between war fighting and nation building as part of a broader strategy.

Nation Building as a Military Solution

Historically, both the Republic of Korea (South Korea) and the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) have served as laboratories for the concept that nation building can be achieved through military intervention. This idea reflects the intersection between applied philosophy and military strategy. The objective is to stabilize a region, promote democracy, and prevent the spread of communism or other adverse forces through military means.

The Role of Hegel in Understanding Ethical Dilemmas

While Clausewitz's Paradox provides a framework for understanding the ethical and strategic dimensions of war, Hegel's philosophy offers deeper insights into the human condition and the complexities of moral decision-making in warfare. Hegel's ideas, particularly his concept of Nation-State Theory and the dialectical process, shed light on how conflicts evolve and how ethical standards are applied in the midst of war.

The Assassination of the Diem Brothers: A Moral Abrogation

The assassination of the Diem brothers in South Vietnam highlights a critical shift in the application of the Just War Doctrine. The brothers, particularly Diem, were seen as leaders who could potentially stabilize the region through effective governance, but their assassination marked a moral abdication of the principles of justice and peace. This event underscores how ethical decision-making in warfare can be undermined by the pursuit of hegemonic ambitions, a theme that resonates in contemporary geopolitical discussions.

Contemporary Implications and Ongoing Relevance

The principles of applied philosophy, particularly in the context of the Just War Doctrine, continue to be relevant in the contemporary world. The evolving narrative of the January 6 conspiracy highlights the enduring importance of ethical decision-making in the face of political and military actions. As society grapples with issues of democracy, nation-building, and the use of force, the lessons from applied philosophy provide a necessary framework for understanding and addressing these complex challenges.

Conclusion

Applied philosophy, with its focus on the practical application of philosophical principles, plays a crucial role in addressing the ethical dilemmas and strategic challenges of modern warfare. The Just War Doctrine, as articulated by Clausewitz and further explored through the works of philosophers like Hegel, provides a framework for understanding and applying ethical standards in the midst of conflict. As the world continues to evolve, the principles of applied philosophy offer valuable insights and guidance for navigating the complexities of contemporary global challenges.