The Educated Class and the 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'

Since the 2016 election, there has been a significant shift in the perception of the American societal structure. Gone are the days of an educated class that led with reasoning and logic. Now, what remains is a fragmented society divided into numerous tribes. Perhaps one of the most prominent and lamentable of these tribes is the Government and Propaganda Network, which is heavily influenced by the CCP. This group, composed of indoctrinated individuals, has almost clinical detachment in their actions, characterizing a deep dissonance with the American constitutional values of individual liberty.

It is noteworthy that, despite a strong foundation provided by the Constitution and a long-standing culture of individual freedom, the tyrannical structures built over more than a century continue to undermine these principles. This has led to a situation where reason and rationality are no longer paramount. Instead, the educated class often falls prey to emotional and illogical reactions, as evidenced by phrases such as 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' This condition has emerged as a significant leveling factor, reducing even the most educated groups to a state of irrationality.

When a discourse is dominated by references to supposed educational credentials devoid of substance, it inherently dilutes the quality of the conversation. Moreover, the reliance on emotional appeals and speculation, often coupled with accusations of racism, demonstrates a profound lack of understanding and reasoning. Instead of fostering a genuine dialogue, these tactics serve to further polarize the society, creating a feedback loop of misunderstanding and mistrust.

An Example from the Field: A Failed Attempt at Understanding

One of the most notable failures of genuine understanding occurred during a project where high school students from Chicago traveled to rural Wisconsin, a state that had voted for Trump. These students were motivated by a desire to understand the perspective of Trump supporters, a segment of the population that has long been poorly understood by the ruling and pundit classes. However, their approach was marred by a significant lack of preparedness and misplaced assumptions.

The Chicago students’ project was conceived as a noble attempt to bridge the divide between urban and rural America. The students sought to gain insights into the motivations behind Trump’s victory and to learn from their rural counterparts. However, the outcomes were far from ideal. The project revealed several shortcomings:

Prior to the trip, the students did not conduct any preliminary research or engage with any of the individuals they would encounter during their trip. The students’ preconceptions were evident, with many students harboring misconceptions about rural American life and its inhabitants. The conversation quickly devolved into discussions about race, with students asking about the racial composition of the group and the impact of race on people’s experiences.

The Chicago students’ failure to understand the complexities of rural American life and their inability to separate their preconceived notions from the reality on the ground underscore the need for a more nuanced and open-minded approach.

Dispelling Myths and Understanding the Trump Supporters

To effectively govern and understand the present-day American society, it is imperative to dispel a series of widespread myths and biases. Some of these include:

Racism: The myth that rural Americans are devoid of racism. In reality, racism is not unique to any particular geographical location; it is a complex issue that affects urban and rural areas differently. Police Brutality: The belief that police brutality is exclusive to urban areas is a misconception that fails to address the concerns of many rural residents who may face similar issues but with different jurisdictions. Gun Violence and COVID-19: The impression that gun violence and the impact of COVID-19 are confined to urban settings is flawed. Both issues are prevalent across all regions, affecting different communities in various ways.

It is crucial for the educated class to adopt a truly inclusive and empirical perspective, recognizing that their solutions and policies must benefit all segments of society, not just urban dwellers. Only by addressing and understanding the specific concerns of Trump supporters can lasting change and unity be achieved.

Conclusion

In closing, the 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is a clear indicator of the erosion of critical thinking and logic within certain segments of the educated class. It is essential to transcend emotions and biases, engage in genuine dialogues, and approach our fellow Americans with open minds. By doing so, we can begin to address the complex issues facing our nation with empathy and understanding, fostering a more united and inclusive society.