The Disadvantages of Accredited Schools and Universities
While accreditation is often seen as a badge of quality and reliability for educational institutions, it is not without its downsides. The accreditation process and its various practices can lead to significant challenges for schools and universities. This article explores these disadvantages, providing examples and insights from personal experiences.
Understanding Accreditation and Its Impacts
Accreditation, the official recognition of an educational institution by an external body, is designed to ensure that a school or university meets certain standards of educational quality and scope. However, it depends heavily on the accreditor and its specific rules and practices. Ensuring that accreditation is effective and beneficial is crucial, as its impacts can be substantial.
Challenges and Pitfalls
Low Standards of Education
One major drawback is the possibility of a decline in educational standards. For example, I once taught at a fairly new unaccredited school that later obtained accreditation. Interestingly, the standard of education suffered after the accreditation. This may be attributed to changes in curriculum or teaching methodologies mandated by accreditation rules, which may not always align with quality educational standards.
Overemphasis on Paperwork
Some accreditors or their auditing teams are overly focused on paperwork and documentation rather than actual educational outcomes. Faculty and students may feel their efforts are being overlooked in favor of ensuring compliance with bureaucratic requirements. This can create a gap between theoretical standards and practical education.
Unreliable Auditors and Incompetent Evaluators
The reliability of auditors and evaluators is another concern. Not all accreditation auditors are honest and impartial. In some cases, incompetent or biased individuals may hold positions and have significant influence over the accreditation process, impacting the quality of the evaluation.
Political Correctness and Data Management Requirements
The frequent changes in political correctness can be detrimental to the educational process. Programs and content that were previously deemed acceptable may be subject to sudden changes, making it difficult for institutions to keep up with the evolving standards. Additionally, some of the data management requirements set by accreditors can be overly burdensome and sometimes even illogical, impacting the efficiency and effectiveness of educational institutions.
High Costs with Little Benefit
The costs associated with compliance with accreditation requirements can be substantial, often comprising up to 30% of the total education costs. However, in many cases, these costs do not provide significant benefits either to the institution or its students. The focus on paperwork and procedural compliance can overshadow the actual educational outcomes and goals of the institution.
Exceptional Accreditors
It is important to note that not all accreditation bodies are problematic. Some accreditors are genuinely excellent and go above and beyond to ensure high educational standards. These bodies are often difficult to find, but their commitment to quality and integrity is undeniable.
Conclusion
The accreditation process can have both positive and negative impacts on educational institutions. While it aims to ensure quality and consistency, it is essential to critically evaluate the specific practices and outcomes of each accreditor. Institutions and students should be aware of the potential downsides and seek out accreditors that truly enhance educational quality and outcomes.