Introduction

The recent discussion about Jill Biden dropping her 'Dr.' title has ignited a debate that touches on issues of recognition, respect, and the broader scope of what it means to be a 'doctor' in society. This article explores the reasons behind the outrage and the implications of the media's attention on this issue.

The Initial Controversy

The initial article from the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) asked Jill Biden to drop her 'Dr.' title, which sparked significant outrage among many on social media and in the general public. The argument behind this request is that Mrs. Biden should not retain a title that emphasizes her academic achievement, as her role is primarily as a spouse to a politician.

Why the Outcry?

The outrage stems from a deeply rooted discomfort with the idea that a woman should be required to relinquish her accomplishments, her doctorate, in order to symbolically align herself with a political career. The demand to drop her 'Dr.' title was perceived as demeaning and misogynistic by many. Just as in the example given, it would be seen as an unacceptable demand for someone to drop their Esq. title after a 40-year career as an attorney.

Understanding the Doctorate Title

It is worth noting that a PhD or doctorate is an academic achievement that is recognized and celebrated across society. Calling someone 'Dr.' is an honor and acknowledges significant intellectual and academic contributions. The term 'Dr.' is not reserved exclusively for medical doctors but is used to indicate the highest academic degree (PhD) as well.

Equivalence of the Terms

The argument that 'Dr.' is reserved for medical doctors ignores the fundamental equivalence of the terms. Both 'Dr.' and 'MD' (Medical Doctor) are titles used to denote advanced academic and intellectual achievements. There is no hierarchy in the value of these titles; they merely indicate different types of academic disciplines and achievements. Thus, the assertion that one is 'more real' than the other is rooted in misunderstanding and misinterpretation.

Controversy and Public Opinion

Public opinion on the issue is divided, with some finding it nonsensical and others finding substantial reason for concern. For many, the issue touches on the respect and recognition accorded to academic achievement. The political implications of such titles often overshadow their academic significance, leading to debates about the value and importance of these titles.

Outsiders and The Media

It is also important to note that the media's focus on this issue is partly driven by efforts to remain relevant and generate content that garners attention. The outrage and social media attention are often manipulated by those on social media seeking to fuel headlines and debate. Those who enjoy being outraged have found a reason to voice their opinions, but such issues are often trivial to the broader challenges facing the country.

Conclusion

While the debate about Jill Biden's PhD title may seem minor in the grand scheme of things, it reflects deeper societal issues surrounding the recognition and respect of academic achievements, and the imposition of gendered expectations on women's roles. As we move forward, it is crucial to approach such issues with a critical and inclusive mindset, ensuring that recognition and respect are not contingent upon perceived compatibility with political roles.

Keywords

Jill Biden, PhD Title, Misogyny, Political Spouses