The Debate Over School Subjects: What Should Be Ditched?

The education system is a complex web of subjects, each designed to equip students with skills necessary for life. But what if you could subtract one subject from your school day? Which subject would be the most compelling candidate for elimination? This article explores the perspectives from various viewpoints and questions the core elements of an effective education.

Literalist Perspectives: Subjects Opposing Scripture

From a literalist viewpoint, some argue that certain subjects should not be taught because they oppose religious beliefs. For example, one respondent suggests dropping subjects like cosmology, skin bleaching, and hair perming. They argue that teaching such subjects goes against God's revelation and can lead to spiritual blindness and eternal loss. These views emphasize the importance of teaching subjects that align with religious doctrines and values, such as faith-based education and moral instruction.

Practicality vs. Enrichment: Core Subjects Essential for Literacy

Others believe that the core subjects are essential for preparing students for the modern world. They argue that subjects like mathematics, English, computer skills, and financial literacy are crucial. These skills provide a foundational understanding of the world, protect students from misinformation, and open doors to future career opportunities. Some even suggest that subjects like history, geography, and foreign languages should not be entirely eliminated but rather offered in shorter courses.

Electives or Removal: Art, Music, and Physical Education

Another perspective argues that certain subjects should be made elective or removed entirely. For instance, one respondent suggests making art and music electives, with grading on a pass/fail basis. They believe this approach would alleviate unnecessary academic stress and allow students to pursue their interests without fear of academic penalties. Similarly, physical education (PE) can be required depending on state graduation requirements, but it should be graded on a pass/fail basis to ensure that all students can graduate without feeling pressurized.

Language Proficiency and Budget Constraints

Some argue that English as a Second Language (ESL) programs should be eliminated, particularly in areas where language proficiency is not a significant issue. They suggest that students should learn English on their own dime and time, emphasizing the need for better resource allocation to other subjects. This perspective advocates for a more efficient use of school budgets, ensuring that other critical subjects receive adequate attention and funding.

The Case Against Physical Education

A physically-based perspective suggests that Physical Education (PE) should be the subject to be dropped. This view argues that PE might not be as essential as other subjects, given the time and resources required. Another respondent suggests reducing assemblies, particularly those that are seen as wasteful, such as pep rallies. They believe that only the most important and impactful assemblies should be retained.

Overall, the debate over which subject should be eliminated is complex and multifaceted. Each perspective offers valuable insights into the importance of different subjects and the challenges of ensuring a balanced and effective education system. The key lies in finding a balance between core academic skills and holistic development, ensuring that students are equipped for both academic and personal success.