Tattoos in the Royal Family: Are They Allowed and What Do They Represent?
The question of whether members of the royal family can have tattoos has been circulating in the public domain for quite some time. The answer, surprisingly, is that there is no explicit prohibition against tattoos among the royal lineage. This article delves into the historic and modern practices of tattooing among the royal family, exploring the fascinating reasons behind their choices.
A Historical Exploration
One of the last British royals known to have gotten a tattoo was King George V, who acquired a tattoo while serving in the Royal Navy. While he had a lion and two dragons tattooed during his service, he did so decades before he ascended the throne. At that time, George V was the second son of the then Prince of Wales and had no expectation of becoming king. This historical context illustrated that tattoos among the royal family have been notable but not unprecedented.
Modern Practices and Prejudices
Several other members of the royal family have served in the Royal Navy, an institution where tattooing is quite common. However, if any of these royals have tattoos, the information has not been made public. The perception of tattoos, particularly in the upper echelons of British society, is often associated with vulgarity. Despite this, public figures, including members of the royal family, can make their own choices regarding body modifications as long as they consider the public image and reception.
Understanding the Royal Perspective
The royal family, like any other public figures, must navigate the complex interplay between tradition and modernity. While there is no law explicitly forbidding tattoos, the upper classes have historically shied away from such forms of body art. This reluctance comes from the belief that tattoos might be seen as too provocative or unsuitable for their position. For instance, the idea of a royal attendee at a prestigious event sporting intricate body art could lead to public derision.
Piercings and Tattoos Among the Royal Family
Interestingly, most members of the royal family have limited their body piercing and tattooing to ear piercings. The primary reason for this is the practical need to ensure the safe wearing of expensive and precious jewelry such as earrings. However, even this practice is not universal, as some royals have chosen to skip even ear piercings, opting for drop earrings instead.
The Late Prince Philip and Tattoos
The late Prince Philip was particularly interested in tattoos and had several from his naval service. His interest extended beyond just having the tattoos themselves; he would engage in conversations with various individuals about their body art. This sheds light on the fact that some royals find interest in body art as a cultural and artistic expression, rather than merely a violation of societal norms.
Conclusion
The practice of tattoos among members of the royal family is a complex issue, influenced by historical context, social norms, and personal preferences. While there is no explicit ban on tattoos, the decision to ink one's body is carefully considered to maintain a positive public image. The stories of the royal family members who have tattoos reveal a blend of tradition and modernity, reflecting the evolving attitudes towards body art in high society.