Strategically Seeking Mentors in Top Research Domains: Beyond Top 20 Programs

Applying to PhD programs in six months, you might be asking yourself, ‘How should I systematically search for advisers who are top scholars and mentors, but work outside of top 20 programs?’ This question is significant not only because of the individual's aspirations but also because of the diverse factors influencing mentor-mentee relationships.

Identifying the Right Mentors

It's important to recognize that not all top scholars are equally effective mentors. Some may have poor interpersonal skills, treating students and post-docs as lesser beings, which can be toxic unless you have a very thick skin. Others are clueless about nurturing and guiding junior colleagues effectively. These insights highlight the necessity of a carefully considered approach to identifying the right mentor.

For instance, I have found that being a mentor to self-directed and motivated individuals comes naturally, due to my busy schedule and multiple commitments. However, I am less effective when it comes to students and post-docs who need a lot of hand-holding. The key is finding a match between your personality and the mentor's. Additionally, personal circumstances such as sabbaticals or professional commitments can impact a mentor's availability, making it crucial to ensure they will be around and focused before making a commitment.

Personal Commitments and Availability

Consider the fact that certain periods of a successful scholar's career, such as sabbaticals and startup ventures, can render them less accessible for mentorship. For example, I am about to go on sabbatical for a year or two, making this an inopportune time for a student to engage with me. Similarly, scholars who are engaged in startups, national organizational roles, or government positions may also be less available due to their professional commitments. It is essential to take these factors into account when evaluating the feasibility of a mentorship relationship.

Not Relying Solely on Funding

Many people might initially think that a mentor’s funding capacity is a primary factor in their choice. However, this is not always the case. Some academics can make significant progress without substantial funding, while others might be between projects. Therefore, it is advisable to focus more on the mentor's expertise, guidance, and teaching style than solely on their funding potential. What you truly want to learn from a mentor is not necessarily about grantsmanship, but about your personal growth and professional development.

Direct Communication and Feedback

The best strategy, in addition to the advice mentioned, is to directly communicate with potential mentors. This involves verifying their availability and focus, ensuring a good fit, and even speaking to some of their past and current mentees to get their perspectives. This proactive approach can provide you with valuable insights that a simple web search might not reveal.

Another effective method, suggested by Ben Y. Zhao, is to target new hires. These individuals are often less known but highly effective, particularly in areas like economics and management. By reaching out to them before they start their new position, you could significantly increase your chances of being accepted into their program.