Do the Children of Nobility Refer to One Another by Titles?

The query of whether children of nobility prefer to address one another by their titles or by their given names is a fascinating one. Contrary to the romanticized narrative often depicted in literature or television, most nobles I have encountered do not feel the need to use formal titles amongst their friends. Life for them is far from the drama of Downton Abbey or the professional rigidity of The Apprentice. Life, for many, is simply life.

Age and Natural Behavior

Even at the tender age of 15, many nobles remain children. The practice of addressing a son of a lord as anything other than by name seems outdated and might even be seen as patronizing. There are those that would advocate for the precise usage of 'Tom' for a young gentleman from a family of lords, just as there are variations in customs. The key point is that it is not a universal practice.

Familial vs. Non-Familial Relationships

When it comes to siblings, matters are straightforward. Brothers and sisters would naturally call each other by their given names or by family nicknames. This is more or less an extension of the natural closeness and familiarity found in any close-knit family. There isn't usually an instilled need to use titles in these familial exchanges.

When it comes to non-siblings, the approach again depends on the nature of the relationship. In formal situations, especially when dealing with potential political or social alliance negotiations, titles would be used. For example, if an uncle and niece were discussing the political implications of their connection, they might use formal terms of address to maintain the respect and seriousness of the occasion. In informal settings, such as when playing games or going for a walk, they would likely use first names, mirroring the way you might call someone 'John Smith' based on the context.

Practical Examples

During my time in school, a scenario involving titled individuals among the student body offers some insight. Out of 550 boys, approximately 20 were members of the titled classes. These young nobles had their own ways of making things easy. For example, George Howard, an Earl of Effingham, had a son named John Howard, who held the title of a titular Viscount Wells. In the close-knit network of schoolmates, he was known as John Howard or simply John. Count Mapelli Mozzi was another who went by his name, Mapelli Mozzi, showing that there is a mix of how children of nobility address each other, based on their relationships and the context of their interactions.

Conclusion

While the practice of nobles using titles among themselves is not as widespread as one might think, it certainly does exist. The fluidity and adaptability in how titles are used are tied directly to the nature of the relationships being addressed, much like in any non-noble social group. It reflects a mature and practical understanding of how to navigate both formal and informal settings, ensuring the appropriate level of respect and familiarity is maintained.