MAH-CET MBA 2017: How Tough Was the Paper Compared to Previous Years?

# MAH-CET MBA 2017: How Tough Was the Paper Compared to Previous Years?## IntroductionThe Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MAH-CET) MBA 2017 is a crucial examination for students aspiring to join management programs in the state of Maharashtra in India. This article delves into the analysis of the MAH-CET MBA 2017 paper compared to previous years, focusing specifically on the challenges and nature of the sections. Read on to understand the key aspects of this examination and how it measures up against its predecessors.## Verbal Section### Personal ExperienceFrom my personal experience, the MAH-CET 2017 felt significantly more challenging and lengthy compared to previous years' papers. Verbal reasoning was particularly demanding with longer reading comprehension (RC) passages, which required more time to complete. While it wasn't extremely difficult, the lengthier nature of these passages made the section time-consuming.Reading Comprehension (RC): Long and detailed passages demanded thorough reading and comprehension, making this section more time-intensive than usual.Comprehension and Grammar: The paper featured moderate difficulty in comprehension and grammar sections, which, although not overly tough, could be challenging due to the extensive word count.## Visual Reasoning Section### Sectional AnalysisThe visual reasoning section was undoubtedly the easier and more straightforward segment of the paper. There were no issues or unexpected challenges in this section, making it a relief for many test-takers.

Visual Reasoning: Succeeding in this section posed fewer challenges, and the questions were simple and direct. This section served as a breather from the more intense verbal and logical reasoning sections.

## Logical Reasoning Section### Intense and LengthyLogical reasoning was the most daunting section of the MAH-CET MBA 2017. This section included quite a few complex puzzles, which added to the stress and time pressure faced by test-takers. Furthermore, the input-output questions were exceptionally twisted, making them even more challenging. Despite some more straightforward questions, the majority of the logical reasoning questions were puzzles.

Logical Reasoning: The stress in this section was high with many complex puzzles and input-output questions that were particularly twisted. The lengthiest paper I have encountered thus far, it required considerable time and focused attention to solve each problem effectively.

## Quantitative Aptitude Section### Moderate ComplexityWhile I had limited time remaining in the quant section, the questions were moderate in difficulty but involved substantial calculations. Data interpretation (DI) also required a considerable amount of calculation, making it another challenging component of the paper.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant): The questions were moderately difficult but demanded a significant amount of calculation. The paper featured time and work problems and few geometry questions, making it a challenging segment that required quick and accurate calculations.

## Overall Analysis### Paper LengthinessThe overall impression is that the MAH-CET MBA 2017 paper was lengthier in terms of its sections, particularly the verbal and logical reasoning segments. This extended duration may have affected the test-takers' performance, as the higher number of questions required more time to complete.

My general assessment is that the cut-offs for this year may be on the lower side due to the lengthier and challenging paper. It is hoped that the final results will reflect a more lenient cut-off to accommodate the demands of the examination.

### ConclusionIn conclusion, while the MAH-CET MBA 2017 was not necessarily more difficult in terms of difficulty level, it certainly was a more lengthier and intricate examination compared to previous years. Students should focus on time management and practice a variety of question types to prepare for the next year's examination effectively.---# Relevant Keywords- MAH-CET- MBA Entrance Exam- 2017 Paper Analysis