Is GI Joe Suitable for Children?
As a parent who has dedicated over two decades of her life to raising two healthy and fully grown sons, the idea of them joining the military is one that brings a mix of pride and trepidation. The decision to glorify military service is not something I take lightly, since it could lead to their funerals or leave them severely disabled, becoming a long-term care burden for myself and possibly others. With these concerns in mind, I have avoided pushing the soldier archetype and military glorification to my sons.
My Parenting Philosophy and the Soldier Archetype
I did not spend much time glorifying military service or pushing the soldier archetype because it feels like an invitation to their funerals or a lifelong struggle with potential disabilities. I believe the world is a complex place, and the decisions we make can have profound and often unexpected consequences. The experience of my sons joining the military to "bring democracy" to the Third World appears as an extravagant and dangerous game, one which I do not wish to play with my children.
My parenting philosophy is centered around protecting my children from unnecessary risks. I recognize the inherent dangers and the possibility of severe consequences, both immediate and long-term, that come with joining the military. The idea of putting them on the "chopping block" is too risky for me, and I do not want to expose them to such dangers.
Military Toys and the Blood for Oil Game
GI Joe, as a representation of the military archetype, is often marketed as a fun and adventurous toy, but it also plays a significant role in the broader narrative of the "blood for oil game" and the concept of "bringing democracy." These narratives, while often appealing in their simplicity, present a sanitized and one-dimensional view of military service and its broader implications. They gloss over the real-world complexities, risks, and consequences.
The idea that military engagement is about "bringing democracy" is a trope that often conceals the true motivations and geopolitical interests behind such actions. The commercialization of military toys like GI Joe can reinforce this narrative, turning a serious issue into a seemingly harmless and fun activity for children. While I understand that some parents and patriotism enthusiasts might advocate for such toys as a way to instill a sense of pride and duty in their children, I do not believe it is appropriate for my own sons.
My stance is that we should play the "blood for oil game" as a serious and reflective adults, not as a sanitized and over-simplified toy that we might play with our children. I do not want my sons or any child to be exposed to the risks and dangers of such a complex and often morally questionable endeavor. I hope that, as responsible adults, we can engage in more meaningful and thoughtful discussions about the true nature of military service and its implications.
Description of the Content
This article discusses the author's personal stance on the use and appropriateness of military-themed toys, specifically GI Joe, for children. The author reflects on her journey as a parent and her reservations about glorifying military service due to the potential risks and long-term consequences. The article delves into the broader implications of military glorification in popular culture and the complex ethics involved in military engagement.
The content emphasizes the author's decision to avoid exposing her own children to such risks and her hope that others can engage in more thoughtful and reflective discussions about these issues. It highlights the importance of critical thinking and responsible parenting in the face of popular narratives and commercial interests.