General Shermans Relationship with His Peers: Admiration for Grant and Criticism of Others

General Sherman's Complex Relationship with His Peers

During the American Civil War, General William Tecumseh Sherman had a multifaceted relationship with his fellow Union generals. This relationship was marked by both admiration and criticism. Sherman's interactions with his peers, particularly General Ulysses S. Grant, provide valuable insights into the dynamics of leadership and decision-making during wartime.

High Regard for Ulysses S. Grant

One of the most notable aspects of Sherman's relationship with other generals was his high regard for Ulysses S. Grant. Sherman saw Grant as a capable and decisive leader, qualities that were essential in the challenging environment of the Civil War. This admiration was particularly evident during their collaboration, particularly during the Vicksburg Campaign and Sherman's subsequent campaigns in the South.

The relationship between Sherman and Grant grew so strong that they maintained a friendship despite not always being able to meet in person during the latter years of the war. Their correspondence, in the form of strategic letters, helped to coordinate their efforts and maintain a cohesive strategy against the Confederacy.

Criticism of Other Union Generals

While Sherman had a high opinion of Grant, his relationship with other Union generals was marked by a mixture of respect and criticism. Sherman was particularly critical of generals who he felt were overly cautious or lacked the necessary aggressiveness to win the war. Two prominent examples of this were General George B. McClellan and General Ambrose Burnside.

General McClellan, known for his cautious nature and reluctance to engage the enemy, was particularly on the receiving end of Sherman's criticism. Sherman viewed McClellan as a potential hindrance to the Union's objectives and once famously remarked, 'I would rather have forced McClellan’s army to go into action one day sooner, than to take [General Albert] S. Williams' whole Division at the breaking up of winter's camp.' Similarly, General Burnside, who Sherman felt was less aggressive than necessary, was also the subject of critical comments from Sherman.

The Battle of Missionary Ridge and Patrick Cleburne

Despite his high regard for certain generals, Sherman could not help but express some admiration for Confederate General Patrick Cleburne. During the Battle of Missionary Ridge, Cleburne successfully defeated Sherman's corps, presenting a stark contrast to Sherman's own experiences during the battle.

While the overall outcome of the battle was a victory for the Union, Sherman's personal experience with Cleburne's division was decidedly challenging. This encounter, marked by Cleburne's tactical prowess, likely instilled a certain level of respect in Sherman, despite his ultimate defeat.

Admiration for Grant and respect for Cleburne coexisted within Sherman's complex personality, contrasting his outspoken nature and desire for decisive leadership among his peers.

Concluding Remarks

While Sherman respected and admired certain generals, such as Grant, he often found himself frustrated with the leadership of others. His critical nature, although sometimes controversial, was a reflection of his belief in the importance of decisive and aggressive leadership during the Civil War. The relationship between Sherman and his peers provides a valuable historical perspective on the challenges and dynamics of leadership in wartime.