Exploring the Challenge of Explaining Existence: An Insight from Atheists and Theists

Is it necessary to explain everything that exists? Do atheists admit that they cannot provide an explanation for existence?

The Irrelevance of Unexplained Existence

Many things we see or have documented do not need an explanation for their existence. Things that have not been discovered or documented yet cannot be confirmed one way or the other because we lack evidence of their existence. This is no different from the concept of a god, which, due to lack of empirical evidence, cannot be confirmed or denied.

Existence and Non-Existence are Empirical

If we cannot provide a clear explanation for something's existence, does it mean that existence itself ceases to exist? The answer is no. Existence is an empirical fact, just as the lack of evidence for a deity is also empirical. This raises the question: can we, as a society, afford to accept the empirical as simply unexplainable?

Attitudes towards Unknowns: Atheist versus Theist

Atheists often admit their ignorance with respect to the unknown, saying 'I don’t know, but I’ll look into it and get back to you if I discover anything.' On the other hand, theists often invoke a higher power to explain the unexplainable, saying 'God did it.' This response is more about religion than it is about seeking an understanding of the universe. In short, religion can often be a synonym for ignorance when it comes to providing explanations for existence and its mysteries.

The Theistical Perspective: An Empirical Problem

Theists, like atheists, face the challenge of explaining existence. Theists are equally perplexed by the origin and purpose of the universe and the existence of the divine. Lack of answers from theists regarding where their chosen god came from, how it created the universe, and why it did so indicate that religion does not provide a comprehensive explanation for existence.

The Mission to Discover and Understand

Both theists and atheists have a duty to seek understanding. While atheists express a willingness to admit their ignorance and seek answers, theists often prefer to attribute explanations to divine intervention, which does little to foster inquiry or enlightenment. This difference in approach highlights the importance of empirical evidence and open-minded inquiry in the face of the unknown.

Conclusion and Call to Action

As believers and non-believers, let us strive for a better understanding of the universe and its mysteries. By admitting our limitations and pushing for answers, we move closer to a world where knowledge and discovery reign supreme. It is time for both theists and atheists to embrace the empirical and the unknown, and work together to unravel the enigmas of existence.