What Term Should We Use for People Without BPD?

Honestly, neurotypical or non-disordered is fine by me. Still… almost any term is not going to personally offend me. As long as I know what they are talking about, it's good enough.

Clarification Through Terminology

When discussing without BPD, the term is used in a clarification of perspectives or viewpoints. It is neither about defining a group nor is it about dismissal. A person without BPD would be like a non-autistic person when discussing autism. The term 'non-BPD' is used to make things clear in a specific discussion.

Vagueness of 'Normal'

The term 'normal' is too vague and hard to define in today's context. Many people have underlying conditions or issues. For instance, someone with generalized anxiety disorder may technically fall into the 'disordered' category. Hence, using terms like 'neurotypical' or 'non-disordered' becomes necessary.

A Better Understanding of Our World

In our world, there is a spectrum of empathy, ranging from those with no empathy to those with full empathy. Our world is one where everyone's feelings and thoughts are accessible. Empathy in our society is more like 'entry-level' and is considered shallow. We consider only those who are fully authentic to be 'normal' in your terms. These are a minority, and unfortunately, it's taken time for this to be recognized.

Proposed Terms

Quasi-human or Humanoid might be more fitting. These terms describe individuals who appear to be human but are still only half-way there in terms of emotional and mental development. Halflings is another term that could be used, taking on a derogatory connotation to highlight the urgency for change.

Fostering Awareness and Empathy

Using terms like 'normal' and 'neurotypical' might give a false sense of security and smugness. It may not motivate people to do anything about their low levels of empathy and consciousness. It's time to recognize that the majority of these so-called 'normals' are stuck at lower tiers of Maslow's hierarchy of 'human' needs and are living a half-life.

Perhaps more proactive language is needed to encourage individuals to take responsibility for their complacency and ignorance. Terms that carry a sense of urgency may help. The 'masses' have the numbers and the voting power, but they also have the power to demand change.

Conclusion

It's essential to choose terminology wisely in the context of mental health and empathy. By using terms that promote awareness and empathy, we can encourage individuals to take responsibility for themselves and contribute to a more empathetic society.