ESE 2018: A Comprehensive Analysis for Mechanical Engineers

ESE 2018: A Comprehensive Analysis for Mechanical Engineers

Hi there! In this article, I'll provide a detailed analysis of the ESE 2018 exams from a mechanical engineer's perspective. We'll dive into the exam's structure, trends, and offer insights based on real-world experiences. Whether you're preparing for your GATE prelims or just curious about the challenges of the exam, you're in the right place.

Overview of ESE 2018

Comparing the last two years, the cutoff for ESE-2018 in the Mechanical category was higher, even though the number of vacancies was greater. This unusual trend can help us understand the varied nature of the ESE exams. Let's break down the exam into its components to get a clearer picture.

Preliminary Examination (Prelims)

Paper 1 - GS (General Studies)

The General Studies paper was traditionally seen as a common paper for all four branches, but the 2018 paper had a significant tilt towards concepts related to Civil and Mechanical. This was evident in the exam hall as I reviewed the paper, and could see that it was more aligned with the technical areas. Engineering drawing questions were surprisingly absent, and the focus was on mathematical aptitude, quality safety, material science, and ethics, rather than on environmental, ICT, and current affairs topics.

Paper 2 - Technical

The technical portion was relatively easier, and the cutoff reflected this. The focus was on emerging topics like Mechatronics and Robotics, with a high number of very basic questions on these subjects. Production concepts such as forging and rolling had less emphasis, but topics like thermodynamics, heat transfer, refrigeration, and air conditioning were extensively covered. It seems that the UPSC is now focusing more on new concepts rather than traditional machining techniques. However, as with all exams, preparation across the board is key.

Main Examination

The main examination posed different challenges, broken down into two papers.

Paper 1 - Design and Analysis

The selection of questions was crucial. Many questions required assumptions based on realistic data, such as a water geyser heating water to 80 degrees Celsius. Avoiding such questions was a smart move. With ample space for answers and short questions, I managed to score 214. While an attempt of 300 was possible, this paper was generally perceived as easier than the other.

Paper 2 - Fundamentals and Advanced Topics

This paper covered all the subjects in the syllabus, including an expected question on DH (Denavit-Hartenberg) parameters in robotics. Space scarcity was a challenge, but practicing the QCAB (Question Correct Answer Begin End) format helped. The paper was lengthy, and thus a good practice of writing concise answers was essential. I managed an attempt of 270, and focusing on new concepts was strongly suggested for success.

Interview Experience

The interview process consisted of two panels: one conducting a stressful interview and the other a more relaxed one with standard questions. Each panel had its pros and cons, and the marks allocated for the interview were lower than in previous years.

Conclusion and Resources

Overall, the ESE 2018 for Mechanical engineers was a mixed bag. The trends indicated a shift towards more technical and emerging concepts, with a need to balance the General Studies and technical papers effectively. For those aiming to do well, thorough preparation across all areas, coupled with solving previous year's papers and understanding the latest trends, is crucial.

To learn more and stay updated, please check out my blog for additional resources.