Determining the Primality of Numbers of the Form 10^n 3: A Comprehensive Analysis

Determining the Primality of Numbers of the Form (10^n 3): A Comprehensive Analysis

Prime numbers have fascinated mathematicians for centuries due to their fundamental role in number theory. One particular form that often comes into focus is (10^n 3). This article explores the primality of these numbers using concepts such as Euler's Theorem, Fermat's Little Theorem, and direct divisibility tests.

Introduction to Euler's Theorem

Euler's Theorem, a generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem, provides us with a powerful tool to determine congruences involving powers. The theorem states that for any integer (a) and a positive integer (n) where (a) and (n) are coprime, we have:

[a^{varphi(n)} equiv 1 pmod{n}]

where (varphi(n)) is Euler's totient function, which counts the number of integers up to (n) that are coprime with (n).

Applying Euler's Theorem to (10^{12} equiv 1 pmod{13})

Let's analyze the specific case of (10^{12} equiv 1 pmod{13}):

(10^{12} 1 mod 13)

(10^91 10^7 mod 13 -3^7 mod 13 -3 mod 13 10 mod 13)

This implies that:

[S mod 13 10, 3 mod 13 13 mod 13 0 mod 13 13k text{ for some } k]

Thus, (S) is a composite number because it is not prime.

Using Fermat's Little Theorem for (10^{9133} equiv 609 pmod{13})

Fermat's Little Theorem states that for any integer (a) and a prime (p), (a^{p-1} equiv 1 pmod{p}) if (a) is not divisible by (p). Let's apply this to (10^{9123} equiv 609 pmod{13}):

(10^{9123} 609 equiv 1 pmod{13})

This does not show that (10^{9123}) is prime, as it involves other powers and modular arithmetic.

General Argument for (10^{6k 1} cdot 3)

The smallest prime divisor of (N 10^{6k 1} cdot 3) is 13. Hence, numbers of the form (10^{6k 1} cdot 3) are not prime. Let's delve into the details:

Each of 2, 3, 5 divides exactly one of (10^{6k 1}) and 3. Therefore, none of them divide (N).

Modulo 7:

(N equiv 3^{6k 1} cdot 3 equiv (3^6)^k cdot 3 equiv 3 otequiv 0 pmod{7})

Modulo 11:

(N equiv (-1)^{6k 1} cdot 3 equiv -3 otequiv 0 pmod{11})

Modulo 13:

(N equiv (-3)^{6k 1} cdot 3 equiv (-3^6)^k cdot 3 equiv 0 pmod{13})

Therefore, 13 divides (N), making it composite.

Direct Divisibility Test for 13

We can also verify whether (10^{91} cdot 3) is divisible by 13 using a simple divisibility test. The rule is to add four times the last digit to the remaining leading truncated number:

(10^{91} cdot 3 100...0000000000003 text{ (92 digits)})

Apply the rule:

100...0000000000003 (rightarrow 100...000000000012) (91 digits) 100...000000000012 (rightarrow 100...00000000009) (90 digits) 100...00000000009 (rightarrow 100...0000000036) (89 digits) 100...0000000036 (rightarrow 100...000000027) (88 digits) 100...000000027 (rightarrow 100...00000030) (87 digits) 100...00000030 (rightarrow 100...0000003) (86 digits)

Continuing this process:

80 digits (rightarrow 10000003), 7 digits 7 digits (rightarrow 1000012), 6 digits 6 digits (rightarrow 100009), 5 digits 5 digits (rightarrow 10036), 4 digits 4 digits (rightarrow 1027), 3 digits 3 digits (rightarrow 130), 2 digits 2 digits (rightarrow 13), 1 digit, divisible by 13

Hence, (10^{91} cdot 3) is divisible by 13, confirming that it is not a prime number.

Conclusion

We have explored the primality of numbers of the form (10^n 3) using various mathematical theorems and tests. The examples provided, (10^{12}), (10^{9133}), (10^{91} cdot 3), and the general argument using (10^{6k 1} cdot 3), all demonstrate that these numbers are not prime. Understanding these concepts can help in identifying composite numbers and simplifying number theory problems.

Keywords

prime number Euler's Theorem Fermat's Little Theorem