Biden vs. Trump: Who Will the New Administration Hire?

The question of who will fill the top positions in the Biden administration has been a topic of much discussion and speculation. The comparison between the current administration and the previous one is a stark reminder of the significant differences in political approaches and priorities.

Qualifications over Party Loyalty

While it's tempting to assume that political affiliations would play a significant role in staffing decisions, the Biden administration may prioritize qualifications over party loyalty. In an interview, one expert commented, 'Biden may hire the ones who are sufficiently qualified. Some had no qualifications other than being Republicans.' This approach aligns with the Biden administration's focus on bringing in individuals with proven track records and expertise.

The Pentagon and Beyond

One area of particular focus is the Pentagon, where the Biden administration may aim to reverse the personnel changes made by the Trump administration. An expert weighed in, stating, 'Of course he can and will. All of the leadership in the Pentagon that Trump fired. All of the doctors and scientists. All of the Inspectors General that even pretended to do their jobs. All of the people in the EPA, CDC, FDA and others whose jobs are to protect the environment and keep us healthy and secure.' This sentiment suggests a desire to bring in competent professionals who can address the critical issues in these positions.

LEMAILD General Mattis and the Past Tradition

The re-hiring of military leaders, such as General James Mattis, has been mentioned as a possibility. A political analyst noted, 'I have no idea but General Mattis would seem to be one of the best guys to re-hire. I believe it was almost customary in the past to fill one of the posts with someone from the opposing party.' This indicates a willingness to consider individuals with bipartisan support, even if they previously served under the previous administration.

Welcome to objection to a Dictatorial Leadership

The contrast between the Trump and Biden administrations is evident in their approaches to leadership and governance. The Biden administration is likely to welcome individuals who can provide diverse perspectives and critical thinking, rather than individuals who blindly follow orders. An expert pointed out, 'I hope so. Many of those people Trump fired were people who disagreed with things he was doing. The problem with Trump is that he wants "Yes men" who would outright do his bidding without question or disobedience or independence. Trump doesn't listen to anyone else but himself. And each of his pathetic voters and followers who don't think for themselves allow him to get away with things. Like their precious president, they don't listen to facts and accept reality; they instead accept anything he says who sends out conspiracy. Each of those people Trump fired is people who stood up to him in one way or another and the problem with Trump is that he wants to be a dictator and ruler instead of a leader.'

Including Non-Party Affiliated Individuals

While Trump's approach to staffing was often criticized for being too partisan, the Biden administration is expected to include a diverse range of non-party affiliated individuals. A political analyst suggested, 'Not the non-socialist ones. Outside of Big T's folks, Romney has a very good chance of becoming a high-ranking officer.' This indicates a more inclusive approach to staffing, reflecting a broader base of talent and expertise.

The Role of Public Servants in Transition

Another aspect to consider is the role of public servants who have served throughout the Trump administration. The question of whether these individuals will be offered positions in the new administration has been a point of discussion. An expert concluded, 'Going by Trump's early habits of hiring and firing people … what was the name of his new Press Advisor … the one that during the first press conference jumped on his desk like a 15 year old crossing his legs … Squeamish … or … now denegrating Trump. Why would Biden hire Trump appointed “yes men” that even Trump fired after appointing them? The usual practice is for the new President to extend the employment of individuals that have done “the job.” But can you name the public servant that did with Trump in charge.' This highlights the complexity of staffing transitions and the need for a careful evaluation of each individual's performance and suitability for the new administration.