Do Democrats Still Support Common Core Standards Despite Lack of Evidence for Student Benefits?

I am not a Democrat. However, as someone who spent 35 years in public education, I have firsthand knowledge of the Common Core standards and their potential benefits for students. Despite some misconceptions around what Common Core is intended to be, it is more than just a set of teaching methods. It is a list of common skills and knowledge that students are expected to acquire by specific grades.

Understanding Common Core

Common Core is not about how to teach basic skills. Instead, it sets forth a blueprint for what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. The purpose of these standards is to ensure consistency and uniformity in educational expectations across different states and regions. This is particularly beneficial for students who move frequently, as the educational landscape can vary significantly between states or even within the same state.

The Importance of Consistent Learning Standards

Imagine a scenario where a student moves from Massachusetts to Illinois or from one town within a state to another. The curriculum in these places might not align, leading to a fragmented learning experience. For example, one school might teach certain concepts in second grade, while another school might teach them in third grade. This inconsistency can leave students with "swiss cheese" learning - knowledge that has gaps and no clear way to catch up. By setting these standards, Common Core aims to provide a framework that ensures students have a solid foundation of knowledge at each grade level, regardless of their location.

The Role of Local Control

It is important to note that Common Core does not dictate how these skills and knowledge are taught. Local control still plays a significant role in instructional methods and strategies. This means that while the curriculum is standardized, teachers and schools have the flexibility to choose the best methods to help students achieve the outlined goals. This balance between standardization and customization benefits both students and educators.

The Skeptics' Perspective

Some individuals, including those who may not support the Democratic Party, have concerns about Common Core. These concerns often revolve around the impact of standardized testing and the perceived lack of evidence showing tangible benefits for students. While it is understandable to have skepticism about any educational initiative, it is crucial to examine the broader context and intent behind Common Core. The goal is not only to measure student performance but also to ensure a consistent and comprehensive education system.

Conclusion

Despite the criticisms and concerns, Common Core standards serve an essential purpose in ensuring educational equity and consistency. The benefits extend beyond mere testing results and include the provision of a clear roadmap for student learning. Understanding and supporting these standards can help students excel in an increasingly mobile society, where living in the same town as their parents and grandparents is no longer a given.

While not everyone may agree on the effectiveness of Common Core, it is important to approach this topic with an open mind and a willingness to see beyond the surface level. As a retired educator, I believe that Common Core has the potential to improve the educational experience for students by ensuring they receive a well-rounded education that prepares them for the future.